Supreme Court Sidesteps West Texas University Drag Show Dispute
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees freedom of speech, a cornerstone of American society.
 |
| Supreme Court denies request by student group to host drag show at West Texas A&M University |
However, the boundaries of this right become blurrier when artistic expression crosses with social norms and personal beliefs. This complexity was recently highlighted in a case involving a drag show at West Texas A&M University (WTAMU) and the Supreme Court's decision not to intervene.
In March 2024, Spectrum WT, a student organization that supports LGBTQ+ students, planned a charity drag show on campus. The event aimed to celebrate self-expression and raise funds for an LGBTQ+ charity.
However, university president Walter Wendler abruptly canceled the show, citing concerns that drag performances were
"derisive, divisive and demoralizing misogyny."
Spectrum WT vehemently disagreed, arguing that drag is a form of artistic expression protected by the First Amendment and a celebration of "queerness, gender, acceptance, love, and especially femininity."
 |
| Tuesday, March 21, 2023, at West Texas A&M University in Canyon, Texas, protesting the university president's decision to cancel a drag show on campus. Michael Cuviello/Amarillo Globe-News/AP via CNN Newsource |
This dispute started a legal battle. Spectrum WT sued WTAMU, claiming the university's decision violated their free speech rights. The case landed in federal court, where a judge initially sided with the university.
However, a separate Texas court decision struck down a state law restricting drag shows as unconstitutional, creating a legal conflict within the state. Spectrum WT, facing a tight deadline before the scheduled show, appealed to the Supreme Court as a last-ditch effort.
The Supreme Court's decision not to intervene in the Texas drag showcase was significant for several reasons. First, it left the issue unresolved at the highest court level. Lower court rulings remain in place, leading to a confusing legal decision in Texas regarding drag shows.
Second, the decision offered no explanation for their inaction, leaving legal scholars and activists to speculate about the reasoning behind the court's silence.
This case also raises broader questions about LGBTQ+ rights in Texas. While same-sex marriage became legal nationwide in 2015, Texas remains a conservative state with a history of discriminatory laws targeting the LGBTQ+ community. There are no statewide protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity in housing, employment, or public accommodations.
Additionally, Texas has a "bathroom bill" introduced in 2017, which though not currently enforced, would require transgender people to use restrooms corresponding to their sex assigned at birth in schools and government buildings. These examples highlight the ongoing struggle for LGBTQ+ equality in the state.
 |
| Supreme Court denies request by student group to host drag show at West Texas A&M University |
The Supreme Court's decision in the drag showcase has far-reaching implications. It underscores the ongoing debate about the balance between free speech and personal beliefs. It also highlights the patchwork of LGBTQ+ rights across the United States, with Texas serving as a prime example of a state where federal protections haven't translated to full equality at the state level.
Will the lower court rulings regarding drag shows hold up on appeal? Will the Supreme Court eventually weigh in on the issue of free speech and LGBTQ+ expression? These questions remain unanswered.
However, one thing is clear: the struggle for LGBTQ+ rights continues, and the Texas drag showcase serves as a reminder of the ongoing fight for artistic expression, free speech, and equality for all.